Tuesday, 12 December 2023

Ladies and Gentlemen (Part Two)

House of Worth evening gown, 1897

I will continue my series by repeating the following two points: first, that the foundation of good manners is understanding that other people are real and, second, that my context is the East Coast of Scotland in 2023.

I will add that when it comes to "the done thing," there is a difference between fashion--changing ephemera, like what sells best in Primark--and behaviour. Naturally, one influences the other. The shortening of skirts, cutting of hair, and baring of backs in the 1920s did not usher in an age of chastity. 

It is tempting at this point to write at great length about women's clothing: a sure attention-getter on the internet and beyond. Let us see first what Authority says. 

What Authority Says

Mrs Humphry (1897) devotes a chapter to defending the "irrational dress" worn by women of her time, arguing that women who adopt "rational dress" (promoted by early feminists) risk being called "dowdy" by their male acquaintances and never escorted by them to restaurants. She also suggests that wearing "eccentric" clothing leads the wearer to become "eccentric" herself. Above all, she condemns the "intense vulgarity in dressing in loud colours and glaring styles in order to attract attention to herself."  

Ward, Lock & Co (1930) rules that the "true lady is always well, because suitably, dressed. She sacrifices extremes of fashion to comfort, puts her clothes on carefully and properly, is scrupulously particular about shoes, gloves and neckwear, and then never gives them another thought. She displays little jewellery out of doors, reserving her diamonds for evening wear, and never wears anything which would attract undue attention either to her appearance or her conduct." 

Sarah Maclean (1962, no relation) states that "the basis and first rule of all good dressing remains what it has always been: to wear the right thing at the right time and place." She then writes several sensible pages about what to wear at various times and places in 1962 and (third edition) 1963. Civilization in the United Kingdom then fell off a cliff, so if you're a woman at one with me on the project of restoring it, I invite you to follow her advice, except for the wearing of hats and gloves. There are few hats you can get away with wearing now without attracting "undue attention," so choose very carefully. Wearing even white cotton gloves in the heat of the summer anywhere except a wedding or the King's Garden Party may attract quizzical looks and, in Scotland, rude remarks. 

Why God cares what you wear

Unlike podcast moralists, these Authorities have nothing to say about women's clothing leading men to perdition. (They leave the Care and Feeding of a Lady's Reputation to other chapters.) My own view, which is certainly different from the one I held before I understood that men are not deformed women, is that we are our brothers' keepers. Good manners between the sexes is the understanding that members of the opposite sex are real and have their own real challenges. 

Women-in-general find it difficult to do a pull-up on the chin-up bar. Men-in-general find it difficult not to look lustfully at a woman in tight, revealing clothes. It is very bad manners to wear skin-tight leggings and a crop top to class and then, when challenged, say that men need to learn custody of the eyes. The woman who says this does not understand that men are real and have their own real challenges. She has made the same error as the man who neglects to see a female friend safely to her doorstep, train or bus at night--or thinks it is a terribly funny joke to put her in a headlock or to creep behind her on the street and grab her arms. 

I seem to have strayed from my intention to instruct men how to ask a woman for a dance and women how to accept or reject the dance gracefully. I shall leave that for next time and just tell my interested audiences  what men and women wear to the TLM in Edinburgh.

Clothing: The Right Thing at the Right Time and Place

TLM in Edinburgh

There is no longer a canonical requirement for women to cover their heads at Mass; I am not sure if the Code of Canon Law still states, as it did in 1917, that men must remove their hats upon entering the church. Nevertheless, boys and men almost invariably do and should remove their hats upon entering any Christian church (among other places, like the parish hall, a ballroom, or a private home). 

At diocese-approved Traditional Latin Masses in Scotland, most--but not all--women cover their heads, either with a chapel veil (mantilla), a scarf, or a hat. Most--but not all--women wear a skirt and top, or a skirt suit, or a dress. The hemlines of these skirts and dresses stop at the knee, the ankle, or somewhere in between. 

It is worth noting that the majority of women in Edinburgh who wear trousers to the TLM and remain bareheaded are over 60. But even if you are a young woman visitor and don't have a scarf, a veil or a hat with you, just come on in. (If you go to the SSPX chapel, however, you will be required to borrow a veil, and if you are wearing trousers you will be the only woman so attired.) You risk making a poor impression if you appear at a Sunday TLM in sloppy athletic wear, a short skirt, or leggings (unless you are wearing a long skirt over the leggings). You will stick out like a baboon's blue bottom, distracting both your brothers and sisters in Christ.

For the same reason, I hold that you should never be the only woman at a Novus Ordo wearing a chapel veil. If you feel you simply can't go to Mass bareheaded, tie a scarf around your hair, pull on a beret, or find a seasonal hat. Taking care not to distract Catholics at the Novus Ordo is honouring the fact that Catholics at the Novus Ordo are real. 

Most men at the diocese-approved Traditional Latin Mass in Edinburgh seem to wear their traditional "Sunday best," whatever that best happens to be. Some wear ties. Some do not. Some wear jackets. Others wear pullovers. Some wear jackets AND pullovers. Some wear jackets and waistcoats. Others just wear dress shirts tucked into their trousers. Some wear corduroy trousers, a woolly jumper, a tie and a tweed jacket. A few wear a matching jacket and trousers with a tie (e.g. the classic navy blue suit), which I believe is the lay male TLM uniform in some parts of the United States. 

It goes without saying that men do not wear T-shirts, shorts, or athletic wear to the Edinburgh TLM. (Little boys and girls wear whatever their parents succeed in struggling them into, but in general little girls wear skirts or dresses, too, and they look very sweet.)

The custom of unmarried girls wearing white mantillas and married or widowed women wearing black mantillas is observed in Edinburgh but not stringently. I'm not sure we all even know about this custom or if it should be called a "custom." It may be merely a "fashion."

It is the height of bad manners for someone to reprove a stranger for his or her attire at Mass. (I suppose a priest might have a word with a man.) If the inappropriately dressed stranger is female, she realized her error long before the Kyrie, guaranteed. If she can overcome her embarrassment--and nobody is rude to her--she will be back the next week in a maxi-skirt and scarf. 

Here, by the way, is my favourite mantilla maker.  

Trad Tea Dances/Waltzing Parties

To my great joy, the guests all decided to come to my first Waltzing Party dressed smartly. From photographs taken at the event, I see that most of the men wore dark suits and ties. All the women wore skirts or dresses. One young man and one young lady even wore white gloves. They did not set a fashion for white gloves at waltzing parties, but everyone seems to have agreed that Mrs McLean's Waltzing Parties are dress-up events. 

Everywhere Else 

The overarching rule that seems to govern clothing worn in public in Scotland is that the clothes must be clean and, in the city, be new, look new or come "distressed" from the manufacturer. (In the country you can wear your wool-and-tweed and waxed-thread raincoat to rags.) It is much easier to wear cheap new clothes than to repair good old clothes because cheap clothes are so very cheap. (This is, of course, problematic for reasons I won't get into today.)

Football clobber

The one taboo I know of is the wearing the uniform (or "strip") of football teams in certain bars and pubs.  I would also advise visitors to Scotland not to wear association football jerseys in the street. There's a whole protocol around Scottish football that you probably don't know. 

University  

Having consulted a Edinburgh Uni student, I can safely say that you can wear anything you like to class, from cashmere and tweed to the same sweatshirt and joggers every day. This makes it easy for Catholic girls--and any other girls--who wish to wear modest, feminine clothing to do so.

Law 

Regarding lack of clothing, men can legally go bare chested in Scotland and women cannot. A very few very young women sometimes take their tops off in public anyway to flout the law, or show that they are just as good as men, or to further the decline of Western Civilization. 

In the immortal words of the American comedienne Laura Horn, "Try that in a Trad Crowd.

Restoring Western Civilization

On Sunday afternoons I often stare out the top of a double-decker bus at the shoppers walking up and down Edinburgh's Princes Street. To relieve the gloom, I play a game called "Spot a well-dressed person" or "Find a woman wearing a skirt." 

In winter especially, this is a challenging game. Almost everyone on the street is wearing blue jeans or black leggings and a dark casual coat. For contrast, have a look at photographs or films of Edinburgh in the 1950s, 1960s--even the early 1970s. I get the sense from these artifacts that back then people dressed as though they thought other people were real and very likely judging their attire from the tops of passing busses. 

Princes Street even takes on a slightly sinister atmosphere on Saturday nights as women in stiletto heels, low-cut necklines, and high-cut hems (or the ubiquitous black leggings) totter onto Frederick Street. In winter they sometimes drape wooly scarves around their necks in place of overcoats, bosoms open to the elements. What their masculine counterparts are wearing I couldn't tell you, as I'm too intimidated to look at them. 

As I wrote above, women readers interested reversing our societies' downward spiral could do worse than find a copy of Sarah Maclean's The Pan Book of Etiquette and Good Manners and decide if they can follow her advice without attracting undue attention. Men readers, however, should ignore the 1897 fashion tips in Mrs Humphry's Manners for Men. 

I have little hope of bringing white gloves back into fashion, but if enough of us tried hard enough, we could Make Edinburgh Look Like a House of Bruar Catalogue Again! 

Update: What are the clothing customs or fashions of your TLM community? 

8 comments:

  1. Couple of comments from your History-of-Fashion friend:
    1) Clothing wasn't necessarily more modest in Europe before WWI. Well-to-do women wore incredibly low necklines starting about the 16th century, especially in the evening.
    As for poorer women, they were in the habit of hiking their skirts up to their knees when working in the fields and, above all, when doing laundry in the village square, especially in the warmer countries of southern Europe.
    Both groups wore no underclothing on their nether regions until - I think - the 18th century, which made it easy for men to reach in and grab a 'feel', as we say now.
    2) What really led to social and sexual decline after the Great War was - tada! - the automobile, which, though not widely available to people of modest fortune outside the USA, still led to great changes in behaviour in the Western world. Suddenly, many young people had an enclosed, perambulating sofa at their disposal - what's not to like? And as most of us fail to realise, the behaviour of the upper classes has an influence on those lower down the ladder. They said, 'Well, if ladies and gents can do it, why can't we?"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, I do admit that historically necklines have been low (if by 1830 only at night), but in some more devout places--like French Canada--there was resistance in the 19th century to the evening gown décolletage insisted upon by British fashion. (Saw it in a Montreal museum clothing exhibit: fury about the dress code for the then-Prince of Wales' tour.) But I'm not comparing the 1920s to the naughty 18th century, but to the prior era of Victoria the Good. (Imagine if Edward VIII had been a good man, and also if WW1 had never happened!)

    I admit also to the motorcar as the driver (!) of the post-WW1 social/sexual decline. Mrs Humphry was disturbed by the bicycle's effect on morals; I can only imagine what she thought about the automobile. And, yes, as always the rich and prominent set the tone--although that could be (and was) resisted, too, e.g., by Mrs Humphry in 1897. She hinted darkly against certain kinds of Country House Parties, and with good reason.

    It is interesting that--before 1920--women were more modest about legs than breasts, but I suppose this may have had something to do with motherhood. After 1920, looking like a boy was more fashionable than being a mother, I suppose.

    At any rate, many (most?) women of various TLM communities are rebelling boldly against "the naked dress" (et al), and I'm delighted. I think I will be able to manage long skirts for another 10 years or so before donning the uniform of Edinburgh old ladies who lunch: black slacks, cardigans, scarves.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like the story about decolletage in French Canada, which I know nothing about. I also like that people are aware of the importance of cars. Zones of modesty do shift often; but sometimes fashion history repeats itself, in a way. I've always thought that 1960s shifts, sheaths and chemises were a kind of repeat of the fashions of the late 18th/early 19th century, although those of course were longer. I agree that it's a good thing that TLM communities are encouraging more modest dress in women *and* men. But why switch from skirts to pants in 10 years? I'm an old lady myself, by that definition, and I still wear skirts often.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, I will keep wearing skirts to Mass, at least, but I am conscious of the tripping and falling on the stairs problem. But who knows? Since I have already sided with The Youth on the subject of mantillas, perhaps I will continue to dress youthfully (if traddily) into old age. By the way, I had a thought: horse-drawn carriages also involved a perambulating sofa, so what made the difference? Cars getting further faster or cars being easier to screen behind bushes? (Mrs McL)

      Delete
  4. Horse-drawn vehicles tended to be cold, I think, even with braziers and furs. But the other difficulty they imposed was that people couldn't let horses stand idly while they embraced, unless they had a coachman. But you could probably hide in the bottom of a deep unhitched cart, covered wagon (or unattended coach, like the couple in Titanic) - but I must say I'm just guessing about this....

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm very much enjoying this series on etiquette/dancing/saving Western Civilization. We are simpatico. You've been touching on the very topics of my senior thesis, in the context of Jane Austen and her novels. Arthur Murray would also approve (there is a wonderful etiquette chapter in his book, How to Become a Good Ballroom Dancer). PS. I wonder how many of the pants-wearing older ladies are doing so because their falling-apart, orthotic-requiring feet need to be in Hokas, which would simply look awful with a dress. My skirts and dresses have been langushing in my closet because of that very issue. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for telling me about Arthur Murray's book! I will now try to find it. My feet are falling apart already and finding smart shoes is a indeed a challenge! I know that there are brands that cater to these kinds of feet, but they seem to be online only, and I hate buying shoes without trying them on first.

      Delete
  6. At my TLM parish, about 95% of women wear veils, with 2.5% in hats and 2.5% bareheaded. Almost all are in skirts/dresses. Roughly 70% of the men wear at least a suit jacket if not a full suit, with the remaining 30% almost all in sweaters or dress shirts. I love that the congregation takes the idea of “Sunday best” seriously and am 100% on board with your aim of making the streets look like as fabulous as old films - but one thing that I think needs to be conquered is exactly that concern, or at least the irrational/excessive part of it, of attracting undue attention to yourself with your wardrobe choices. I think many women today feel weird about wearing a nice dress or skirt when they’re out and about doing normal things, as if doing so will draw funny looks or mark them as eccentric. I wear almost exclusively skirts and dresses (the only trousers I have in my closet are used for exercise and gardening), and I personally don’t feel like I’m standing out in the wrong way - I never get nasty remarks, only compliments, but sometimes the compliment is followed by a comment like, “I wish I could pull that off” or occasionally something along the lines of, “Isn’t that inconvenient/uncomfortable?” I don’t really understand either of these attitudes, but I think in order to re-normalize classy everyday outfits, women need to not be afraid of standing out sartorially a little bit. I actually like seeing chapel veils at novus ordo Masses - I used to never see them there, but these days there are almost always a few, about the same ratio as the percentage of women without veils at TLM. On the flip side, I do recognize the importance of respecting others and not purposefully making a spectacle of yourself with an outlandish costume where it really doesn’t fit. I do stop short of impractical hats and white gloves - but it would be delightful if those could be normalized again too!

    ReplyDelete